Table of Contents
Here’s a detailed analysis and review of your Elemental Confluence EA performance for XAUUSD on the H1 timeframe based on the provided backtesting results.
Profitability
- Total Net Profit:
- Achieving a net profit of $127,831.14 from an initial deposit of $5,000 is strong but modest compared to the Cycle of Life EA.
- The Profit Factor of 1.82 (gross profit of $284,458.10 vs. gross loss of $156,626.96) indicates slightly better efficiency than the Cycle of Life EA.
- Expected Payoff:
- The expected payoff of $24.43 per trade reflects moderate profitability per trade, suggesting the system relies on frequent trades rather than outsized gains.
- Winning and Losing Trades:
- Winning trades make up 60.88% of the total, which is a favorable win rate for a trading strategy.
- Average profit trade ($89.28) is slightly larger than the average loss trade (-$76.52), contributing to consistent profitability.
- Largest Trades:
- The largest profit trade ($3,054.32) is over 2.33x the size of the largest loss trade (-$1,310.46), which reflects a favorable risk-reward profile.
Risk and Drawdown
- Absolute and Maximal Drawdown:
- Absolute drawdown: $950.98 — indicates effective capital preservation relative to the starting deposit.
- Maximal drawdown: $4,421.27 (5.19%) and Relative drawdown of 29.05% highlight controlled risk compared to the Cycle of Life EA.
- Risk per Trade:
- Consecutive losses reached a maximum of 15 trades, but the financial impact was contained (-$882.46).
- The largest consecutive loss period of -$2,008.29 (over 10 trades) suggests manageable risk even during poor performance phases.
Efficiency
- Trade Frequency:
- Executed 5,233 trades over the backtest period, averaging about 1.5 trades per day, appropriate for a strategy on the H1 timeframe.
- The system’s high win rate with frequent trades suggests it prioritizes capturing smaller, consistent gains.
- Consistency:
- The system’s largest consecutive wins were 21 trades (profit $2,595.91), indicating streak potential.
- The average number of consecutive wins (3) and losses (2) reflects short oscillations, favoring quicker recoveries from drawdowns.
Key Observations
- Profitability vs. Safety:
- The Elemental Confluence EA generates consistent and steady profit, albeit at a smaller scale than Cycle of Life EA, but with significantly reduced risk.
- Win Rate and Payoff Balance:
- A 60.88% win rate coupled with a reasonable average profit per trade ensures consistent performance.
- While the profits per trade are modest, the system compensates with high trade frequency.
- Drawdown Control:
- The maximum drawdown of 5.19% is within acceptable limits for most traders, showcasing the system’s robustness in adverse conditions.
- Scalability:
- The system appears scalable, as drawdowns are well-managed and losses are capped effectively.
Recommendations for Optimization
- Increase Profitability Per Trade:
- Explore adjustments to take-profit levels to capitalize on larger moves, especially for profitable trades, without sacrificing the win rate significantly.
- Enhance Loss Control:
- While losses are generally well-managed, analyzing losing trades might help refine entry/exit points to further reduce average loss trade size.
- Test with Different Market Conditions:
- Perform forward testing and Monte Carlo simulations to ensure the EA is robust across varying market conditions, spreads, and slippage scenarios.
- Leverage Dynamic Position Sizing:
- Adjust trade sizes dynamically based on equity to potentially increase profits while maintaining low drawdown.
Final Verdict
The Elemental Confluence EA is a solid, low-risk strategy with consistent performance and high win rates. While its profitability is modest compared to the Cycle of Life EA, its drawdown and risk metrics are significantly better, making it a safer choice for steady returns. With minor tweaks to optimize profit per trade, this EA could become an excellent tool for traders prioritizing capital preservation and steady growth.