Through rigorous search.
> Yes, your approach is valid and makes sense. Here’s why using **full > data for ranking** in **Portfolio Master** while focusing on **good [...]
> To classify the values for each metric you mentioned, I'll provide > typical ranges for minimum (min) and maximum (max) values, [...]
> When certain performance metrics are "too high" in a bad way, it could > indicate potential issues with the strategy that may not [...]
> If your results exceed the values I recommended, that’s an excellent > indication that you have exceptionally robust and high-performing [...]
> Profit factor (IS) > 1.4 > Ret/DD ratio (full) > 4 > Stability (is) > 0.6 > open dd % (is) < 50% > cagr/max dd % (is) [...]
> what i must do after step 3 for final review and compare? After completing **Step 3** (the Walk-Forward Matrix with real tick data), the next [...]
> data precision whould be Selected timeframe only , 1 minute data tick or Real tick ? this is my step now running; > 1. Autometic Retest H1/H4 [...]
> profit factor, dd,sharp ratio, cagr/dd% and another must be same to > xauusdrank filter right? Yes, when adapting your **XAUUSD strategies** [...]
> Should I retest with adjusted parameters? When **retesting strategies** from XAUUSD on a new pair like **AUDUSD**, you should first consider [...]
> To adapt your 30,000 XAUUSD strategies to another currency pair like > AUDUSD, here’s a breakdown of the best approach for each option: ### [...]